top of page

The SEC's ESG Disclosure Requirements in 2024

A wooden gavel rests on a document labeled "SEC's ESG Disclosure Requirements?"

SEC's ESG Disclosure Requirements: A Moving Target

The SEC's proposed climate disclosure rules, originally set eyes on in March 2022, have generated significant discourse. They represent a potential landmark shift in corporate disclosure, focusing on providing investors with consistent, comparable, and reliable information about climate-related risks.

However, the finalization of these rules has been a moving target, with the initial target date pushed to April 2024. This delay, while not unusual for the SEC, reflects the complexity and contentious nature of the proposal.

Factors Influencing the Delay

The SEC's aggressive stance on ESG disclosure requirements has not been without controversy. There’s significant pushback from various quarters, including:

  • Legal and Political Challenges: The proposal has faced scrutiny and opposition, potentially influencing the SEC's cautious approach toward finalization.

  • Broad Impact and Pushback: The wide-ranging impact of the rules on public companies and the substantial feedback received (over 16,000 comment letters) may contribute to the delay.

  • Comparisons with Past SEC Actions: Historical precedents show varying paces of rulemaking under different SEC chairs, highlighting the unique challenges faced by the current SEC leadership.

Major Questions Doctrine

At the heart of the debate is the question of the SEC's legal authority. The major questions doctrine, as applied in recent Supreme Court cases, suggests that significant regulatory actions with broad economic and political implications should be directly addressed by Congress, not left to administrative agencies.

Potential Limitation of Scope

In response to these challenges, the SEC has considered limiting the rule's scope. This pragmatic approach aims to balance the need for investor-relevant information with legal and practical considerations. However, the final form of the rule and its reception by the market and the courts remain to be seen.

Gensler's Balancing Strategy

Chair Gary Gensler's approach seems to be identifying a broad range of proposals but adopting final rules through a more considered process. This strategy aims to balance robust regulations with the flexibility to withstand legal and political challenges.

The SEC’s Regulatory Focus

Climate Change Disclosure

The most anticipated item on the SEC's agenda is the final rule on climate change disclosure. This rule aims to standardize disclosures related to climate-related risks and impacts.

It’s based on frameworks like the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.

Despite the delay to April 2024, this ruling is expected to profoundly influence how companies report on climate risks and their greenhouse gas emissions.

The Proposed Rule and its Three Scopes

This rule impacts all U.S.-registered companies, obliging them to detail how they manage and govern climate-related risks. Specific, material risks, both present and future, must be disclosed, illustrating their impact on financial performance and strategy.

The SEC's proposed rule centers on three levels of reporting:

  • Scope 1: Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the company.

  • Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions from purchased energy.

  • Scope 3: GHG emissions from the company's value chain, including suppliers and end-users.

Scope 3 has attracted the most attention, due to its broad implications and the challenges it presents for accurate measurement and reporting.

For large entities, reporting encompasses all three scopes, while smaller companies have slightly relaxed requirements.

Corporate Board Diversity

Historically, SEC disclosures on board diversity have been limited. They have typically involved basic information about directors' backgrounds and skill sets. However, this approach has been criticized for lacking depth and failing to address broader diversity aspects such as gender, race, ethnicity, and cultural background.

SEC's Enhanced Focus

Recognizing the increasing demand from investors and society for more substantive disclosures, the SEC is now considering amending proxy rules to mandate more detailed reporting on board diversity.

This move aligns with a global trend towards greater transparency and accountability in corporate governance.

Potential Implications of Enhanced Disclosures

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Data: The new rules may require companies to provide both quantitative (e.g., percentage of board members from diverse backgrounds) and qualitative information (e.g., how diversity impacts board dynamics and decision-making).

  • Definition of Diversity: A key challenge will be defining 'diversity' in a manner that's both inclusive and relevant to stakeholders. This could involve considering a wide range of factors beyond just race and gender.

  • Impact on Board Recruitment: Enhanced disclosure requirements might prompt companies to revisit their board recruitment strategies, potentially leading to more diverse board compositions.

  • Investor Decision-Making: With more detailed information, investors could make more informed decisions based on a company's commitment to diversity, influencing investment patterns.

Human Capital Management Disclosure

Human capital refers to the attributes that employees bring to the workplace, including their skills, experiences, and abilities. Recognizing its importance, the SEC is contemplating requiring companies to provide more comprehensive disclosures about how they manage and invest in their human capital.

Possible Areas of Disclosure

  • Workforce Demographics: Information on the composition of the workforce, including diversity metrics, age distribution, and full-time versus part-time status.

  • Employee Development and Retention: Disclosures about training, development programs, and strategies for employee retention and engagement.

  • Health and Safety Measures: Reporting on workplace safety policies, health-related benefits, and statistics on workplace injuries or illnesses.

  • Workforce Stability: Data on turnover rates, which can be indicators of organizational health and employee satisfaction.

  • Compensation and Benefits: Details on compensation structures, equity, and fairness, as well as information about retirement and other benefits.

  • Impact of Human Capital on Business Performance: How human capital management strategies contribute to overall business performance and long-term value creation.

Climate Change, Corporate Board Diversity, and Human Capital Management Disclosure are at the forefront of the SEC's agenda, reflecting a shift toward a more holistic view of corporate governance and sustainability.

These areas not only address investor demands but also align with broader societal expectations for corporate accountability and transparency.

International Context and Comparisons

California’s Influence

State-Level Legislation Impact

California has taken a proactive approach to climate change with its GHG emissions disclosure laws, setting a precedent that could significantly sway the SEC's economic baseline for its analyses.

The state's legislation demands rigorous reporting from companies on their carbon footprint, which could serve as a model for federal requirements.

Complexity of Dual Regulation

The interplay between California’s state laws and the impending federal regulations creates a layered legal landscape.

Companies operating in California must navigate both sets of requirements, which could set the stage for complex legal maneuvers as businesses align their practices with both state and federal mandates.

This duality raises the potential for strategic legal positioning that could influence or even preempt federal rule-making, potentially leading to litigation that tests the boundaries between state autonomy and federal oversight.

Global Trends

Alignment with IFRS and EU Standards

The SEC’s proposed ESG disclosures are not in isolation but part of a global movement towards increased transparency in corporate sustainability.

Aligning with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation's sustainability standards, the SEC's rules reflect a growing international consensus on the necessity for uniform ESG reporting norms.

These IFRS guidelines provide a framework for companies to disclose their sustainability-related information in a consistent and comparable manner.

Similarly, the SEC's direction appears to converge with the European Union's European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which mandate a broad range of ESG disclosures for European companies.

The ESRS is part of the EU's comprehensive plan to integrate sustainable finance into its financial system and to fund the transition to a sustainable economy.

Harmonization with International Regulations

The SEC’s proposal could pave the way for a more harmonized global reporting standard, reducing the complexity for multinational corporations that face a patchwork of ESG reporting requirements across different jurisdictions.

As these international standards become more entrenched, they will likely influence the SEC’s final rules, ensuring that U.S. companies remain competitive in a global market increasingly focused on sustainability and social governance issues.

The convergence of these standards across major economies underscores the trend toward a global paradigm where ESG factors are integral to corporate reporting, investor decision-making, and regulatory frameworks.

The SEC’s proposal could be seen as part of this larger shift, reflective of the increasing weight of ESG considerations in global finance and governance.

The Road Ahead: Preparing for Compliance

Stakeholders are awaiting confirmation on whether the SEC's disclosure requirements will be announced in April 2024, or if there will be a further delay.

This uncertainty adds another layer of complexity to the already challenging path ahead, which is vital for aligning corporate practices with the evolving global demands.

As businesses await the final rule, the importance of proactive preparation cannot be overstated. Companies must begin aligning their internal reporting mechanisms with the anticipated requirements, ensuring readiness to comply when the rules come into force.

This includes investing in data collection and analysis capabilities, particularly for GHG emissions and other ESG metrics.


Join our ESG Community Forum to collaborate, share knowledge, and drive sustainable change.

Subscribe for updates and be a catalyst for a responsible business future.



Subscribe to our newsletter  Don’t miss out!

Thanks for subscribing!

a black board with letters community

Building Bridges, Not Walls, for Global Unity

Explore ESGinie


Your AI Sustainability Assistant

bottom of page